Today’s word is ‘Capacity’.
1) The maximum amount that something can contain
2) The ability or power to do, experience, or understand something
When Constable Broon fires back an email or returns a call to a referring agency with the simple statement ‘The Multiple Needs service at Gowrie Care lacks capacity at this present time’, to which definition of capacity do we think he is referring? Undoubtedly, he will be using it in the sense of def [1].
To our mind, his response, and the Gowrie Care position speaks more pertinently to a significant deficit of [2] .Out of the mouths of babes.
How can this be? Are Gowrie Care not leading the way for all providers with their seamless transition to the new service, exemplifying the bold assertions of Councilor ‘Everything’s Alright’ Edie of a robust and functional network of Homelessness Services. The bodies piled in the hostels, the complaints of accommodation based services [‘there’s nowhere for them to go!’] say otherwise. Constable Broon is certainly confused, and may need to be referred more frequently to his contemporaneous notes, or perhaps make them in the first place.
To recap: Gowrie provides a little over 500 hours of housing support. Up until the tendering, this was divided between two teams, one focussing on complex needs [around 200 hours given to a small number of clients], and the other offering in excess of 300 to around 50+ clients [low level visiting support], the bulk of which were on packages that sat below the threshold required for statutory approval by Supporting People panel.
Have 50+ people lost a service? Has Gowrie taken on 300 hours of work to replace them …. or has a deal been done with Uncle Bernie and Brother Michael. What kind of deal, you ask … read on!
Just as Care Commission reports are no measure of quality [Brother Michael, at a Lothian Homelessness Forum presentation], it now appears that package size, according to the council, is no indicator of the level or complexity of an individual’s need [as stated in an email from the Commissioning Team]. What could possibly have lead the Council to abandon reason for this madness? Perhaps the lure of the filthy lucre – the mythical ‘efficiency’ savings that lies behind this sorry tendering exercise. TUPE, to steal Phil Larkins lines, fucks you up. It doesn’t mean to, but it does. Well, it does if you don’t cost accurately for it.
SAMH costed accurately for it, acknowledging both its relevance in law and utility in easing the trauma of transition for staff and therefore clients. The Edinburgh Homelink Partnership took a similarlly progressive and enlightened position. Where are these players now? Who is still on the stage? You got it; the Dundee Shamrock Bhoys and their Dapper Don whose TUPE position cycled through a short range of ‘it may not apply’, ‘it does not apply’, ‘it applies but only to tiny portion of Homelink’ and now the repeated triumphal line of ‘It never applied!’
So there you have it: Gowrie have the contract, which they are not fulfilling [they are not offering 700 hours of anything, and less than 50% of what they are offering is complex needs housing support], yet they are not being required to offer it by the CEC as thanks for their unyielding Fuck You Tupe position.